この掲示板は本日にて終了致します。長い間のご厚意を心から感謝して止みません…m(_ _)m （2009.10.8 リベル）
【過去ログ（2005.1.1〜2007.9.30）】
| Reload |
| 全2000件の内、新着の記事から20件ずつ表示します。 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | 《前のページ | 次のページ》 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 以上は、新着順1番目から20番目までの記事です。 | 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
| 《前のページ | 次のページ》 |
THE COUNCIL OF ANCYRA（備忘録）
投稿者：リベル 投稿日：2009年11月 6日(金)13時58分5秒THE COUNCIL OF ANCYRA
CANON XVII - NOTES
DEFILERS of themselves with beasts, being also leprous, who have infected others [with the leprosy of this crime], the holy Synod commands to pray among the hiemantes.
ANCIENT EPITOME TO CANON XVII.
A leper who goes in to a beast or even to leprous women, shall pray with the hybernantes.
<greek>Deprwsantas</greek> is from <greek>leprow</greek> not from <greek>lepraw</greek> and therefore cannot mean "have been lepers," but "have made others rough and scabby." It is only in the passive and in Alexandrian Greek that it has the meaning to become leprous. Vide Liddell and Scott.
There seems but little doubt that the word is to be understood spiritually as suggested above.
The last word of the canon is also a source of confusion. Both Beveridge and Routh understand by the <greek>keimazomenoi</greek> those possessed with devils. Suicer however (Thesaurus) thinks that the penitents of the lowest degree are intended, who had no right to enter the church, but were exposed in the open porch to the inclemencies (<greek>keimwn</greek>) of the weather. But, after all it matters little, as the possessed also were forced to remain in the same place, and shared the same name.
Besides the grammatical reason for the meaning of <greek>leprwsantas</greek> given above there is another argument of Hefele's, as follows:
HEFELE.
It is clear that <greek>leprwsantas</greek> cannot possibly mean "those who have been lepers"; for there is no reason to be seen why those who were cured of that malady should have to remain outside the church among the flentes. Secondly, it is clear that the words <greek>leprous</greek> <greek>ontas</greek>, etc. are added to give force to the expression <greek>alogeusamenoi</greek>. The preceding canon had decreed different penalties for different kinds of <greek>alogeusamenoi</greek>. But that pronounced by canon xvii. being much severer than the preceding ones, the <greek>alogeusamenoi</greek> of this canon must be greater sinners than those of the former one. This greater guilt cannot consist in the fact of a literal leprosy; for this malady was not a consequence of bestiality. But their sin was evidently greater when they tempted others to commit it. It is therefore <greek>lepra</greek> in the figurative sense that we are to understand, and our canon thus means; "Those who were spiritually leprous through this sin, and tempting others to commit it made them leprous.".
（http://biblestudy.churches.net/CCEL/FATHERS/NPNF214/2ANCYRA/ANCCN17.HTM）
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon XVII. Defilers of themselves with beasts, being also leprous, who have infected others [with the leprosy of this crime], the holy Synod commands to pray among the cheimazomenoi.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XVII: A leper who goes in to a beast or even to leprous women, shall pray with the hybernantes.
[The last word of the canon is also a source of confusion. Both Beveridge and Routh understand by the cheimazomenoi those possessed with devils. Suicer however (Thesaurus) thinks that the penitents of the lowest degree are intended, who had no right to enter the church, but were exposed in the open porch to the inclemencies [cheimon] of the weather. But, after all it matters little, as the possessed also were forced to remain in the same place, and shared the same name.]
（http://www.voskrese.info/spl/ancycanon.html）